Author

Image of Julia Cortina.jpg

Julia Cortina

Associate Legislative Director, Human Services & Education | Immigration Task Force

Upcoming Events

Conference

2025 NACo Legislative Conference

Related News

ACTION NEEDED

Urge your Members of Congress to enact a long-term, substantive reauthorization of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.

BACKGROUND

Administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Administration for Children and Families (ACF), TANF provides states with flexible funding for programs aimed at promoting stability, family preservation, and access to employment among low-income households with children.

Although TANF is a partnership between the federal government and states, nine states representing 52.4 percent of total participants delegate TANF administration, including Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements, to counties: California, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio and Virginia. In FY 2023, these states represented $16.8 billion, or 53 percent, of total federal, state and local TANF expenditures (including funds transferred to the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) and Social Services Block Grant (SSBG).

TANF represents an important source of flexible funding for a variety of anti-poverty activities benefiting vulnerable county residents, including cash assistance, child care, education, job training and work support programs. In FY 2023, states used 25 percent of TANF and MOE funds for basic assistance, 8 percent for work, education, and training activities and 12 percent for child care (including funds transferred to the Child Care Development Fund). 

While states have significant flexibility in using TANF funds, the program does impose certain limitations. Families do not qualify for cash assistance under TANF unless states require recipients to participate in narrowly defined “work activities” and a share of a state’s participants meet a minimum weekly work threshold of 30 hours. 

There is also a five-year limit for cash assistance to families that include an adult recipient, although states may exceed the time limit for up to 20 percent of their caseloads based on hardship. Program rules also require states to penalize individuals who fail to meet work requirements with a partial or full reduction in cash benefits. 

The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA) (P.L. 118-5), brought new program changes to TANF work requirements. Under current law, states must ensure that at least 50 percent of single- parent families and 90 percent of two-parent families have adults engaged in work-related activities to receive the full federal block grant. However, for states that have reduced their TANF caseloads since 2005, these percentages are lower. The FRA recalibrates the caseload reduction credit to 2015 levels instead of 2005 levels, thus narrowing that flexibility for states. Additionally, the law allowed for five states to establish six-year pilot programs, replacing their current work participation rate targets, requirements and penalties with alternative "work and family outcomes" benchmarks negotiated with HHS. In three of the states selected, (California, Minnesota and Ohio) the TANF program is administered by county governments. NACo is working closely with counties in these states and our federal partners to facilitate the implementation of the pilot program.

Along with the changes under the FRA, in November 2023, ACF promulgated a proposed rule to clarify allowable uses of TANF, including capping income eligibility for flexible services under the block grant to 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Line. The rule would also adopt new standards to determine whether a TANF-funded activity is reasonably calculated to accomplish a TANF purpose and make other changes to reduce administrative burden. This rule was withdrawn on January 14, 2025, and will not go into effect. (Should we just delete this paragraph?)

As an entitlement, TANF is not subject to the annual appropriations process. However, TANF funding has remained at $16.5 billion annually since its inception, with no growth for inflation, while the formula for state allocations remains linked to data from the mid-1990s. To be eligible for the block grant, states must meet a MOE requirement, meaning they must spend state dollars on TANF-allowable activities.

Congress last reauthorized TANF in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-171) and has renewed the program through a series of short-term extensions since its expiration in 2010.Most recently,  Congress passed a continuing resolution in December 2024 that included an extension of the TANF program through March 14, 2025. Given our role in administering TANF and the importance of the program to supporting low-income county residents, a long-term TANF reauthorization with substantive program improvements and adequate funding is critical for all counties.

KEY TALKING POINTS

  • TANF provides funding to states  to help families reduce welfare dependency and allows states to design and implement the program according to their needs
  • Counties that operate TANF have a direct stake in the program because they share administrative costs and may also fund part of the state MOE requirements
  • When states are directed to sanction TANF participants for failing to meet program requirements, the reduced benefit can lead to county residents facing increased economic hardship, new barriers to employment, and increased reliance on other county support programs
  • A long-term TANF reauthorization will provide program continuity and represents an opportunity to make  substantive  improvements  to  the  program.  Short-term  extensions  create  uncertainty  and make it difficult to plan and implement long-term program changes.
  • TANF reauthorization should provide states greater flexibility in determining which activities count as “work  activities.”  For example, states should be allowed to count higher education as a “work activity.”
  • Many TANF families struggle with multiple barriers to self-sufficiency that make it difficult to meet the full participation requirements. TANF should provide states and counties with flexibility to provide partial credit to families with special needs.
  • TANF funding should increase annually commensurate with the rate of inflation to ensure that the program’s actual value does not erode over time. 
Tagged In:

Related News

Image of Capitol-closeup-4.jpg
Advocacy

U.S. Congress begins work on budget reconciliation process: What this means for counties

The House and Senate Budget Committees have marked up Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget resolutions to initiate the budget reconciliation process to enact policy priorities without garnering bipartisan support, although the two chambers differ in their approach to drafting the legislation. 

Durham County, N.C. Commissioner Wendy Jacobs listens to a speaker during NACo's Intergovernmental Roundtable on Local Behavioral Health Crisis Response. Photo by Nicole Weissman
County News

Panel: People in crisis need support, not handcuffs

Counties can better serve people experiencing a behavioral health crisis by engaging behavioral health specialists instead of law enforcement, experts told county officials at a recent meeting held at NACo headquarters.

US Capitol side
Advocacy

Lawmakers reintroduce the Build Housing with Care Act

On January 30, Senator Ron Wyden and Congresswoman Bonamici reintroduced the Build Housing with Care Act. This legislation would establish a new competitive grant program under HUD intended to boost the supply of co-located child care facilities and affordable housing developments.

kids
Advocacy

NACo submits comments on proposed rules regarding new foster care requirements and strengthening TANF

On November 27 and December 1, NACo submitted comments on two Notices of Proposed Rulemaking from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families that would impact county administration of federal child welfare and anti-poverty programs.

An artist's conception of Caritas Village.
County News

Sonoma County creates solutions to homeless crisis

Wildfire devastation and the COVID-19 pandemic con­tributed to a homelessness crisis in Sonoma County, Ca­lif., prompting the county to create more comprehensive housing offerings to better meet the needs of its most vul­nerable populations.