CNCounty News

FCC halts efforts to cap inmate phone call rates in county jails

Image of shutterstock_447948589.jpg

The FCC will stop trying to cap inmate phone rates

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has halted its efforts to cap the rates that inmates pay when placing phone calls from jails and prisons.

In 2015, the FCC had implemented rules that capped the rates paid by inmates to between 14 cents and 22 cents per minute. This rule was later challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals by prison phone companies who claimed the FCC did not have the authority to cap prices for inmate calls. 

However, as the FCC’s lawyers were in the process of defending the commission’s position, two of the three sitting Democrat commissioners on the five-person commission vacated their seats leaving a new Republican majority that did not support the rate caps. 

Since the new majority has been in place, a letter was sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals stating that the FCC would no longer defend its previous position defending the implementation of rate caps for phone calls placed by inmates.

The case, though, is not over. Although the FCC is sitting on the sidelines, the court case has continued in a hearing earlier this month at the D.C. Court of Appeals.

A portion of the profits made by companies that provide phone services in jails are returned to the jail as “commissions.”  As a result, this revenue can directly impact county jail operating budgets. 

According to the National Sheriffs’ Association, whose members operate approximately 80 percent of the nation’s jails, jails incur significant costs in providing phone services to inmates due to factors ranging from taking security measures to ensure that phone calls aren’t used to engage in criminal activities to recording and storing phone calls to be provided to the courts.


For additional information, contact Terrell at 202.942.4236 or jterrell@naco.org.

Attachments

Related News

cover photo
Advocacy

Congress considers moratorium on state and local AI lawmaking: What it means for counties

The U.S. Senate’s reconciliation bill text includes a 10-year moratorium on state and local AI policymaking.

Image of Telecom-towers.jpg
Advocacy

NACo Legal Advocacy: McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. V. McKesson Corporation

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. V. McKesson Corporation could make it more difficult for counties to challenge FCC orders, many of which have taken steps to preempt and curtail local authority by limiting counties’ abilities to manage their own right of way and assess fair market value permitting and impact fees on providers seeking to construct, modify or extend telecommunications infrastructure in their communities. 

Capitol Building
Advocacy

U.S. House passes rescissions package

On June 12,  the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R. 4) in a narrow 214-212 vote. The legislation would cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding, marking the Trump Administration’s first formal attempt to codify funding cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).