Author

Headshot of handsome man

Owen Hart

Senior Fellow, Rural Development

Upcoming Events

Conference

2026 NACo Energy Symposium

Related News

County News

House passes 2026 farm bill

Foreign ownership of agricultural land is receiving increasing attention from Capitol Hill and state and county governments across the country, especially ownership and transactions involving individuals and entities associated with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While the total amount of foreign-owned agricultural land has increased over the past decade, the percentage of agricultural land owned by foreign individuals or business entities sits at just over 3 percent of all U.S. agricultural land. Entities from Canada and European nations represent the largest foreign owners of U.S. agricultural land. Although Chinese holdings account for less than one percent of total foreign-owned U.S. agricultural land, the amount of land owned or leased by Chinese-associated individuals or entities has increased by over 400 percent from 2010 to 2021. 

While no federal laws restrict foreign agricultural land ownership, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) must regularly report on foreign investments in U.S. agriculture under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA). In turn, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Agriculture-FDA Appropriations Bill included a provision adding USDA to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), requiring USDA to report all agricultural land transactions under AFIDA that may pose a risk to national security. In turn, several pieces of bipartisan legislation that would enact additional reporting requirements for land transactions involving foreign entities or restrictions on foreign ownership are currently under consideration in Congress, including provisions within the House and Senate proposals for the 2024 Farm Bill.

24 states restrict foreign ownership of agricultural land in some form, while 15 states have implemented reporting requirements for foreign transactions using mechanisms similar to AFIDA. While there are currently no local laws banning or restricting foreign ownership, county governments may be directly involved in reporting land transactions involving foreign entities. The impact of foreign ownership on counties and local communities has continued to receive significant national media attention over the past ten years.

Despite the legislative attention being paid to this issue at the federal and state levels, major agriculture and forestry stakeholder groups have largely declined to take a stance on limits on foreign ownership. Nevertheless, the issue is being hotly debated in Congress, specifically as a part of broader national security discussions, and will likely be addressed in some way in the 2024 Farm Bill.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Foreign holdings account for 3.4 percent of all U.S. agricultural land, with Chinese holdings accounting for less than one percent of total foreign-owned agricultural land. However, total acreage of foreign-owned agricultural land has risen sharply over the last decade, particularly for Chinese-associated holdings.
  • While USDA is required to track foreign ownership and investments in agricultural land, there are no federal restrictions on foreign agricultural land ownership. 24 states have put restrictions on foreign ownership of agricultural land in place, and more are currently considering them.
  • Congress is paying increasing attention to the question of foreign agricultural land ownership. The FY 2024 Agriculture-FDA Appropriations Bill included a provision strengthening reporting requirements for land transactions involving foreign entities and are likely to address the issue in the 2024 Farm Bill.

Read More

Related News

1812264077
Advocacy

House passes the 2026 Farm Bill with key county priorities

On April 30, the House of Representatives passed the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (H.R. 7567) by a vote of 224–200. 

Capitol
County News

House passes 2026 farm bill

Although the farm bill expands eligibility and program access in some areas, it does not provide corresponding new funding for rural development programs, which could worsen existing oversubscription and make it more difficult for counties to compete for limited federal resources.

2157489028
Advocacy

NACo submits feedback on USDOT’s rural outreach initiative

On April 23, NACo submitted a response to a Request for Information (RFI) issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) on its Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) Initiative. Given the predominantly rural nature of counties and the important role that counties play in our nation’s transportation system, NACo is uniquely positioned to provide important feedback to USDOT on this topic.