U.S. House of Representatives passes SPEED Act and other permitting reform bills

Author

Charlotte headshot

Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart

Associate Legislative Director, Environment, Energy & Land Use | Gulf Coast Regional Forum
Andrew Nober headshot

Andrew Nober

Legislative Assistant

Upcoming Events

Conference

2026 NACo Energy Symposium

Related News

Image of Capitol-front-day.jpg

Key Takeaways

On December 18, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act (H.R. 4776). The SPEED Act would strengthen county involvement in decision-making and make needed commonsense reforms to the federal environmental review process. 

The SPEED Act would place limits on the scope and scale of NEPA reviews, codify the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colo. decision and prevent the federal government from rescinding permits to already approved projects. NACo secured provisions in the SPEED Act that would guarantee counties a seat at the table during National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; P.L. 91-190) reviews as cooperating agencies. 

NACO SPEED ACT ANALYSIS

The reforms proposed in the SPEED Act would both expand county involvement in the environmental review process and ensure that counties face fewer costly delays during infrastructure, land management planning, housing and broadband projects. The SPEED Act is led by U.S. House Natural Resources Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) and Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) and passed by a bipartisan vote of 221 to 196.

Other Permitting Reforms

The U.S. House also passed several smaller permitting reform bills in recent weeks that make targeted changes to federal environmental review laws:

  • ePermit Act (H.R. 4503): Requires the federal government to establish an electronic permitting portal and digitize the NEPA review process.
  • Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act (H.R. 573): Directs the White House to publish an annual report on the frequency, scope, duration and impact of NEPA reviews.
  • PERMIT Act (H.R. 3898): Eases Clean Water Act permitting requirements and restricts states’ ability to reject permits.
  • Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act (H.R. 3668): Designates the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the sole lead agency for NEPA reviews of pipeline projects or natural gas terminals.

Next Steps

The SPEED Act and other permitting reform legislation now await consideration in the U.S. Senate. NACo will continue to advocate for county involvement in decision-making procedures in any changes to federal permitting processes.
 

Related News

832191974
Advocacy

Endangered Species Committee convenes to exempt Gulf energy projects from Endangered Species Act requirements

On March 31, the Endangered Species Committee convened a meeting to discuss a national security exemption to Endangered Species Act (ESA) requirements for energy exploration and extraction projects in the Gulf. The Committee, which had only previously gathered 3 times since 1978, voted unanimously to grant the exemption.

Image of Capitol-side_2.jpg
Advocacy

Congress examines reforms to endangered species management

On Mar. 18, the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Work held a hearing examining how to improve implementation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The hearing follows several legislative proposals to reform endangered species management that recently advanced in the U.S. House of Representatives.

2253192477
Advocacy

Gulf counties receive more than $92 million in revenue sharing from offshore energy projects

On March 27, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI)  announced hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue sharing from Gulf energy projects, including more than $92 million which will be distributed directly to 42 coastal counties and parishes and Texas, Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi. The revenue is generated from offshore oil and gas projects on the federally managed Gulf Outer Continental Shelf, and a portion is redirected to states and counties.