NACCHO releases report highlighting impact of COVID-19 response on local public health departments

Image of NACCHO-forces-change.png

Key Takeaways

On April 28, the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) released the results of their national survey on local health department (LHD) frontline operations in a report titled "2020 Forces of Change: The COVID-19 Edition." The survey was conducted by NACCHO between October 2020 and March 2021 and measures the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on local public health capacity.  

The report highlights several key survey findings, which include:

  • LHDs spent a total of $3.25 billion on COVID-19 response efforts. 
  • 51 percent of all LHDs experienced harassment as a result of COVID-19 protective measures enacted in 2020 and 65 percent reported that federal, state and local agencies did not provide any additional support or protections in response to the public backlash. 
  • Decades of federal disinvestment in public health left LHDs without the appropriate resources and staff to adequately respond to the pandemic. As a result, 71 percent of all LHDs had to hire at least one additional staff member to assist with their COVID-19 response operations, with 24 percent adding an additional five to 25 staff members. 
  • 65 percent of LHDs spent over $100,000 on their COVID-19 response operations in the first year of the pandemic. 
  • 80 percent of LHDs had to divert resources from core public health interventions, such as environmental health programs, in order to maintain sufficient staffing for the COVID-19 response. 
  • Preventive health programs, including those supporting maternal and child health, obesity prevention and substance use disorder, decreased capacity by over 60 percent

Approximately 70 percent of the nearly 3,000 LHDs are county-based, and another eight percent serve multiple counties. County health departments provide essential public health and prevention services to residents, such as screenings and immunizations; conduct surveillance to detect and monitor emerging infectious diseases; protect the food and water supply; and prepare for and respond to natural disasters and other public health emergencies. They also implement health promotion and health risk education programs to promote healthy behaviors, as well as work with community partners to lessen the burden of chronic disease on communities and reduce health care expenditures.  

Unpredictable and insufficient federal investments in LHDs over the past decade, coupled with the stress of the COVID-19 pandemic response and the ongoing substance use crisis has strained the ability to sustain core public health operations. Counties support additional federal investment to boost the workforce and operational capacity of our LHDs and will continue to work with our federal partners to advance this priority. 

Click here to view the full report from NACCHO and here to view the key facts infographic.  

Additional Resources

Tagged In:

Related News

Medicaid
Press Release

State and Local Government Organizations Express Concern Over Proposed Changes to Medicaid Financing and Requirements

NACo, NLC, NCSL, USCM, CSG and ICMA emphasize the impact of policy changes to eligibility requirements and financing of Medicaid.

Image of Capitol-closeup-4.jpg
Advocacy

U.S. Congress begins work on budget reconciliation process: What this means for counties

The House and Senate Budget Committees have marked up Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget resolutions to initiate the budget reconciliation process to enact policy priorities without garnering bipartisan support, although the two chambers differ in their approach to drafting the legislation. 

Doctor and patient
Advocacy

Congress introduces bipartisan legislation to strengthen rural health care access and funding

Rural communities face unique health care challenges, from provider shortages to funding disparities. To address these concerns, the U.S. Senate recently introduced two bipartisan bills aimed at improving rural health care access and funding: the Rural Health Focus Act and the Fair Funding for Rural Hospitals Act.