FEMA lifts Immediate Needs Funding restrictions

Author

Image of Brett-Mattson.jpg

Brett Mattson

Legislative Director, Justice & Public Safety
Naomi Freel

Naomi Freel

Legislative Associate

Upcoming Events

Related News

New home

Key Takeaways

On October 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) lifted the Immediate Needs Funding (INF) restrictions that were imposed on place on August 7 to manage the rapidly depleting balance of the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF). These restrictions paused funding for non-lifesaving and non-life-sustaining activities, enabling FEMA to focus on urgent disaster response. However, this decision significantly strained local governments, as many long-term recovery projects were halted.

The restrictions were lifted after the Continuing Resolution, signed on September 26, provided FEMA access to $20 billion, allowing the agency to resume processing over 3,000 projects that had been delayed, totaling approximately $9 billion.

INF & counties

The lifting of INF is significant for counties across the U.S. that have been awaiting funding to support recovery and mitigation projects. These projects, which often include essential repairs to infrastructure, are critical to ensuring that communities can recover more quickly after disasters. The end of INF brings several important impacts:

  • Timely Recovery Projects: Counties can expect INF delayed projects to be funded within the next several weeks, allowing vital recovery work to resume. These projects had been paused under INF, meaning that many local governments were waiting for necessary funding to complete repairs and mitigation efforts.
  • Relief for Strained Resources: With the DRF backfilled, counties can resume recovery work that had been on hold, ensuring that essential public services and facilities are repaired and prepared for future disasters. This includes repairs to infrastructure that is critical for community well-being and disaster resilience.
  • Future Funding Concerns: Despite the current access to additional funds, FEMA has warned that if current spending rates persist, INF restrictions could be reimplemented before the end of the calendar year. This uncertainty means counties may face delays in the future, underscoring the importance of advocating for sustainable disaster funding mechanisms.

NACo has been a strong advocate in this space, requesting additional federal funding to replenish the DRF. On September 11, NACo submitted a letter urging Congress to backfill the then-$6.1 billion in halted projects and provide an additional $10 billion to support ongoing recovery efforts. Ensuring a fully funded DRF is critical to preventing future disruptions in disaster recovery.

For counties, the lifting of INF restrictions marks an important step in resuming recovery efforts. However, the continued uncertainty surrounding disaster funding highlights the need for long-term solutions to ensure predictable and stable funding for communities recovering from disasters.

Related News

Flanked by Florida Association of Counties Executive Director Ginger Delegal and Kentucky Association of Counties CEO Jim Henderson, Hawaii County, Hawaii Councilmember Heather Kimball describes the gamut of disasters — earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, nuclear weapons — that Hawaiian counties face. Photo by Bryan Dozier
County News

County leaders look at adapting to ever-changing disaster risks

State associations of counties and their staff can serve a vital role in providing support, experience to counties facing disasters.

Wildfires burn in Los Angeles County, destroying homes and buildings in the Pacific Palisades, Malibu and Altadena neighborhoods. Photo courtesy of California Fire Foundation
County News

Los Angeles County aims to recover and rebuild after historic wildfires

Over a week after a series of deadly fires sparked across Los Angeles County, at least 25 people are dead, thousands of structures, including businesses and homes, have been destroyed and roughly 100,000 people across the county have been displaced.