FEMA lifts Immediate Needs Funding restrictions

New home

Key Takeaways

On October 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) lifted the Immediate Needs Funding (INF) restrictions that were imposed on place on August 7 to manage the rapidly depleting balance of the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF). These restrictions paused funding for non-lifesaving and non-life-sustaining activities, enabling FEMA to focus on urgent disaster response. However, this decision significantly strained local governments, as many long-term recovery projects were halted.

The restrictions were lifted after the Continuing Resolution, signed on September 26, provided FEMA access to $20 billion, allowing the agency to resume processing over 3,000 projects that had been delayed, totaling approximately $9 billion.

INF & counties

The lifting of INF is significant for counties across the U.S. that have been awaiting funding to support recovery and mitigation projects. These projects, which often include essential repairs to infrastructure, are critical to ensuring that communities can recover more quickly after disasters. The end of INF brings several important impacts:

  • Timely Recovery Projects: Counties can expect INF delayed projects to be funded within the next several weeks, allowing vital recovery work to resume. These projects had been paused under INF, meaning that many local governments were waiting for necessary funding to complete repairs and mitigation efforts.
  • Relief for Strained Resources: With the DRF backfilled, counties can resume recovery work that had been on hold, ensuring that essential public services and facilities are repaired and prepared for future disasters. This includes repairs to infrastructure that is critical for community well-being and disaster resilience.
  • Future Funding Concerns: Despite the current access to additional funds, FEMA has warned that if current spending rates persist, INF restrictions could be reimplemented before the end of the calendar year. This uncertainty means counties may face delays in the future, underscoring the importance of advocating for sustainable disaster funding mechanisms.

NACo has been a strong advocate in this space, requesting additional federal funding to replenish the DRF. On September 11, NACo submitted a letter urging Congress to backfill the then-$6.1 billion in halted projects and provide an additional $10 billion to support ongoing recovery efforts. Ensuring a fully funded DRF is critical to preventing future disruptions in disaster recovery.

For counties, the lifting of INF restrictions marks an important step in resuming recovery efforts. However, the continued uncertainty surrounding disaster funding highlights the need for long-term solutions to ensure predictable and stable funding for communities recovering from disasters.

Related News

Avery County, N.C. Commissioner Dennis Aldridge surveys damage from Hurricane Helene in 2024 in this still from the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners’ documentary, “Rising Above Helene,” directed by Chris Baucom of 100 Strong Productions.
County News

Reimbursement policy prolongs disaster recovery for counties

Counties that suffer major damage during natural disasters would benefit dramatically from a FEMA Act proposal to do away with reimbursement and instead offer counties recovery grants up front.

FEMA
County News

FEMA at a crossroads: What county officials need to know about reform efforts

Two overlapping disaster recovery efforts are now unfolding in Washington: a sweeping executive-branch review of FEMA and a bipartisan legislative push to reform the agency through Congress. County officials should understand both tracks, what they could mean for local governments and where each stands today.

A powerful atmospheric river causes widespread flooding across Washington state in December 2025, damaging homes, businesses and major roadways.
News

Counties regroup after FEMA’s resiliency grant program resumes

As FEMA resumes and restructures its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant program, counties are reassessing projects that were put in limbo during its cancellation and creating new hazard mitigation gameplans ahead of its upcoming funding cycle.