Both the Administration and Congress act on 'noncitizen voting:' What this could mean for counties

Author

Image of Paige-Mellerio-2.png

Paige Mellerio

Legislative Director, Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs | Local Government Legal Center
Emma Conover

Emma Conover

Legislative Assistant

Upcoming Events

Related News

County News

Counties overcome challenges on Election Day

Image of Voting Booth3.png

Key Takeaways

On January 3, Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) re-introduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (H.R. 22). The SAVE Act passed the U.S. House in the 118th Congress but ultimately was not considered in the U.S. Senate. As such, the bill will bypass Committee action and will again be considered by the full U.S. House this week.  

The SAVE Act is priority legislation for Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.) and the White House. On March 25, President Trump issued an Executive Order (Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections) that requires relevant federal agencies to take steps to require proof of citizenship to vote and other election security measures.  

The SAVE Act: An overview

The SAVE Act is an amendment to the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993 that would require individuals to prove their citizenship when registering to vote. Citizenship has always been a requirement to vote in federal elections, but the bill would require states to validate a voter’s citizen status with a valid passport, REAL I.D., military I.D. with accompanying military service record or photo I.D. with approved document indicating birthplace. The SAVE Act will not apply to states that are not covered by NVRA—Idaho, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming. These states either do not have voter registration requirements or they have Election Day voter registration.  

The current voter registration process does not require documentary proof, but rather an attestation of citizenship under penalty of perjury for false claims. The SAVE Act would create new guidelines for vetting voter databases and provide free access to a federal database to confirm a voter’s citizenship status. Criminal penalties would be imposed on election officials who materially assist or successfully register individuals to vote who are unable to show proof of citizenship.  

How does this relate to the recent Executive Order on non-citizen voting?  

Consideration of the SAVE Act in the U.S. House follows the issuance of Executive Order 14248 (EO), however the proof of citizenship requirements differ slightly between the legislation and the EO.  

The EO, requires voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote using federal forms and mandates that ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted. Eighteen states currently only require ballots to be postmarked on or before election day to be accepted. Specifically, the Executive Order instructs:  

  • The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), to update available mail voter registration forms to require proof of citizenship
    • Most states across the country use a state-specific registration form
  • The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to revise the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) to decertify voting equipment not backed up paper in a specific way
    • While each state sets their own election laws, 11 states and the District of Columbia require voting systems to be full certification to federal VVSG standards and could have to replace existing voting systems
  • The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to remove non-citizens from state voter rolls and ensure state and local election officials have free access to relevant federal agencies used to verify citizenship 

How we got here: 

  • First introduced in May 2024 by Rep. Roy and 49 Republican cosponsors, the SAVE Act passed in the House with a vote of 221-198 but failed to advance beyond that point. The SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Roy and 53 cosponsors. House leadership has indicated continued support, and the House is expected to consider the bill’s advancement this week. The Senate timing is still uncertain. The bill faces an uphill battle as its passage would require the vote of at least seven Democratic senators to overcome a filibuster. 

How does this impact counties?  

While states are largely responsible for voter registration processes, county election officials play a role in registering individuals to vote as well as cleaning and vetting voter rolls. Implementing changes included in the SAVE Act could require additional personnel and training for county election officials and poll workers as counties will need to readjust to an in-person voter registration requirement. Significant changes will be required if mail, online registration and registration drives are eliminated. The SAVE Act also means it may be hard for some people to get proper documentation of citizenship, and we may expect an influx of voting-age citizens to apply for valid passports and driver’s licenses.  

The SAVE Act does not authorize additional federal funding for states and local governments to implement these new guidelines. Counties urge the U.S. Congress to fund Help America Vote Act (HAVA) election security grants to assist states and counties improve election administration and potentially implement the SAVE Act. 

Tagged In:

Related News

Image of edit_GettyImages-832282452_cyber card resized.jpg
Advocacy

Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) loses federal funding

On March 11, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) announced a $10 million cut in funding for the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC), which provides critical local assistance for cybersecurity threat detection and analysis resources and support.

Amy Cohen, executive director of the National Association of State Election Directors, outlines her peers’ concerns about the future of election administration. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Election administrators anticipate continued challenges

The 2024 election was success in the eyes of elections administrators, but several panelists see areas of concern brewing for future years.

Paulina Gutiérrez, executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, middle, works on securing the tabulation machines after learning that the doors of the machines at the central counting facility at the Baird Center were not properly sealed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024. Joe Timmerman / Wisconsin Watch
County News

Counties overcome challenges on Election Day

In the aftermath of Election Day, county election offices across the country are taking note of the challenges they faced, including bomb threats, technical issues and ballot printing problems that led to extending voting hours and recounting ballots or duplicating them to be properly scanned.