CNCounty News

Robust crowd turns out to advocate for PILT, SRS

Image of PILT-fly-in-2019.jpg

Key Takeaways

One of the largest PILT fly-ins in years brought roughly 100 county officials to Capitol Hill Sept. 11 to advocate on behalf of permanent mandatory funding for the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program and permanent funding for the Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program.

Both programs compensate counties that contain federally managed land, which cannot yield property tax revenue and counties that have seen a decline in timber harvests from federally managed forest land. PILT paid out $514 million in fiscal year 2019.

County officials met with members of Congress and their staffs, primarily from their home states and members that serve on appropriations committees and authorizing committees that could help advance legislation.

During a Capitol Hill briefing, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) discussed his proposal to reauthoritze PILT for 10 years.

Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) talked up his bill that would expand PILT funding for counties with fewer than 5,000 residents. It would not reduce the PILT amounts paid to larger counties.

One of the most effective points a county official can make is showing how federal policy affects local management and services. For Chaves County, N.M. Commissioner Robert Corn, volatility is a huge problem.

“We don’t know if it (PILT funding) is coming, when it’s coming, how much is coming,” he said. “We fund vehicles for the roads department and sheriff’s office with PILT money, so if it’s not looking good, it’s a matter of trying to get a few more thousand miles out of a vehicle and hoping it holds, rather than replacing it.”

Supervisor Richard Lunt demonstrated to his congressional delegation how budgeting in Greenlee County, Ariz. was complicated by irregular PILT funding.

“We can’t get the biggest bang for our buck, being able to do purchasing that is efficient, buying in bulk, if we don’t have the money,” he said. “The government knows it’s getting a bargain for the services we provide around federal lands. Every year hunters get lost, and every year, we’re sending out law enforcement to find them. It’s something we’re glad to do but there’s no question it’s a bargain for what the federal government gets.”

The large fly-in contingent coincided with an influx of freshman members of Congress. Cascade County, Mont. Commissioner Joe Briggs, who serves as NACo’s West Region representative, offered some advice to newcomers to Capitol Hill.

“There can be an assumption that all the congressional staff members know what the other staffs are doing, and that’s not the case,” he said. “Sometimes we are a bridge, telling them what else we have heard on the Hill because they can get siloed in their offices.”

Image of PILT-fly-in-2019.jpg

Tagged In:

Attachments

Related News

bike
Advocacy

U.S. Representatives introduce bipartisan CERTAIN Act to uphold county participation and streamline federal permitting

On April 15, congressional leaders introduced the bipartisan Create Expedited Reviews to Transform American Infrastructure Now (CERTAIN) Act. Led by Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.), Gabe Evans (R-Colo.), Andrew Gabarino (R-N.Y.), Adam Gray (D-Calif.), Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), the CERTAIN Act would strengthen county consultation and set actionable deadlines for federal environmental permitting processes.

bike
Advocacy

U.S. Forest Services announces distribution of FY 2025 Secure Rural Schools funding

On Apr. 14, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) announced the distribution of $230.6 million to counties through the Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program for fiscal year (FY) 2025. The funding will support essential local government services in more than 700 counties nationwide. The FY 2025 payments announced by USFS were authorized by the Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025 (P.L. 119-58). 

502423299
Advocacy

U.S. Forest Service announces details of major reorganization

On March 31, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) announced details of a major reorganization of the agency’s offices and management structure. The agency’s new structure comes amid a larger reorganization of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which houses the Forest Service.