Beyond ‘duck and cover’: Counties prepare for nuclear threats
After a state emergency employee in Hawaii accidentally sent out a false alert about a nuclear missile strike Jan. 13 — leaving residents and tourists scrambling for a panicky 38 minutes before an all-clear sign was broadcast — some county officials might be wondering: “Could it happen here?” And: “Should our county be preparing for a nuclear attack?”
Maui County Councilmember Riki Hokama said he received the alert. “I wondered why other emergency alert protocols were not enacted (like_ emergency sirens and radio alerts,” he said.
Hawaii’s four counties’ role in such an event is to work as first responders, as well as making county facilities available for use as emergency shelters, he said.
Hawaii’s Legislature started discussions Jan. 19 with those responsible to make improvements in both notifications and preparation, as well as any response in the aftermath of an attack, Hokama said.
Some counties are thinking beyond “duck and cover,” the old standby from the nuclear threat during the Cold War.
In Ventura County, Calif., Public Health Director Robert Levin has been prepping for a nuclear attack since 9/11. “This was a lot of years back, not too long after Sept. 11,” Levin said. “I was listening to the news like everyone else. When I heard Osama bin Laden’s words — that they wanted to terrorize Americans, kill Americans and to hurt us financially, hurt our economy, I realized — because part of what a health officer does is they prepare for terrorism — we had been talking about terrorism with small pox and plague for many months but when this happened, the way you kill the most Americans, terrorize, hurt our economy the most is you knock out a major city with a nuclear device. With that, I decided our county needed to prepare for this.”
‘Get Inside. Stay Inside. Stay Tuned.’
With backing from county leaders, Levin was able to create an 18-page Nuclear Safety Guide, hold town hall meetings, create three public service announcement videos and an emergency plan for all the county’s schools. He knows the plan is a success if residents remember the phrase: “Get Inside. Stay Inside. Stay Tuned.” He’s continued educating the public for more than a decade.
Fast forward to today. With the current political rhetoric between the United States and North Korea, “there is obviously a renewed interest in this, number one, and what we would be talking about here is no longer the size nuclear device that a terrorist might have,” Levin said. “It’s a state-sponsored program, and so their nuclear device would be bigger than that.”
CDC prepping local government
Levin isn’t the only one with nuclear threats on the brain. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was set to hold a presentation Jan. 16 on “Public Health Response to a Nuclear Detonation,” but canceled it due to the nationwide flu outbreak. Presentations that had been scheduled included “Roadmap to Radiation Preparedness” and “Public Health: Preparing for the Unthinkable.” The CDC also held a webinar in August on preparing for nuclear attacks and held an exercise simulating a nuclear blast, dubbed “Operation Gotham Shield,” with FEMA in the New York-New Jersey area last April.
That’s when Middlesex County, N.J. had the opportunity to demonstrate its preparedness efforts with local, county, state, federal, non-profit, volunteer and faith-based organizations. Middlesex County’s objectives for this functional exercise were to hold five training sessions over four days by setting up, operating and demobilizing a Community Reception Center. More than 300 participants from 70 agencies participated.
Since the exercise was conducted, the county’s Office of Health Services has been providing “lessons learned” at preparedness meetings. Middlesex County officials will continue to enhance and update its emergency response plans and continue to meet with local, county, state and regional partners to discuss existing plans and how to apply lessons learned from exercises.
It is also important to educate first responders and the public to ensure that everyone is prepared to respond and recover from an emergency, according to John Dowd, division head, Health Education and Emergency Preparedness, Office of Health Services. Dowd teaches a two-hour course on the basics of radiation and what to do during a radiation emergency. The course covers sheltering in place, self-decontamination and ways to stay informed during a radiation emergency. Responders learn the basic operation of radiation detectors, dosimeters, portal monitors, personal protective equipment selection and decontamination procedures.
Dowd also trains emergency responders to operate monitoring stations to perform population monitoring and contamination reduction measures after a radiological or nuclear incident. The CDC’s Christine Kosmos, director, division of state and local readiness, has said that population monitoring is one of the most challenging responsibilities for local government in any nuclear or radiation incident.
Some areas of the country, especially the West Coast, feel more vulnerable to an attack. In September, the Washington Senate State Government Committee met at the King County Emergency Coordination Center to discuss disaster preparedness in the event of a nuclear attack. Emergency managers in the Evergreen State are currently prohibited from preparing for a nuclear attack, thanks to a 1984 law passed, in part, to mark the winding down of the Cold War. The law makes it against state policy for emergency managers to prepare for evacuation or relocation in case of a nuclear attack. A state lawmaker may reintroduce legislation to change that; it failed last year.
Could a false alert incite panic in your county?
In Hawaii, residents and visitors on Jan. 13 panicked after getting this message: “Emergency Alert: Ballistic missile threat inbound to Hawaii. Seek immediate shelter. This is not a drill.”
“My heart instantly went out to the person who sent that message, I knew there was some kind of miscommunication,” said Matt Ansorge, emergency management director for Leelanau County, Mich. “In the same breath, there was mass hysteria.”
Could a false alarm happen in your county? Gregg Bird, emergency management coordinator, Grand Traverse County, Mich., said that in his county, “without proper training, yes it could.”
Bird advises all counties to have proper training and continued regular training on their systems. “If you’re using pre-staged messages, try to have them easily distinguished between ‘real’ and ‘tests,’” he said.
If the worst happens, and your county sends out an alert in error, what should you do? “Immediately issue a corrected message,” Bird said.
Ansorge echoed those sentiments. “If we did have some sort of false alarm, we would have to immediately communicate through several mediums and multiple emergency managers. The last thing we want is for the general public not to trust the messages that come out next time.”
Read Ventura County’s 18-page Nuclear Safety Education Guide here: http://bit.ly/2B5ljaL
Attachments
Related News
County Countdown – February 11, 2025
Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features a first 100 days update, testimony on rural road safety and more.
President Trump signs Laken Riley Act into law
On January 29, President Trump signed the bipartisan Laken Riley Act into law, requiring the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to detain any undocumented immigrant who has been arrested for violent or property-related crimes and giving states new authority to sue the federal government over certain immigration-related decisions.
Congress reintroduces 9-1-1 SAVES Act
On January 16, the 9-1-1 Supporting Accurate Views of Emergency Services (SAVES) Act was reintroduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. This legislation aims to officially reclassify 9-1-1 dispatchers as first responders, granting these professionals the recognition they deserve for their vital contributions to public safety.